Download Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Dumps after Paying Affordable Charges

2025 Latest ValidVCE PSE-Strata-Pro-24 PDF Dumps and PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1d9JAebXaAKfULzPr1WM0S7KyhXuuERWi

Just like the old saying goes, there is no royal road to success, and only those who do not dread the fatiguing climb of gaining its numinous summits. In a similar way, there is no smoothly paved road to the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certification. You have to work on it and get started from now. If you want to gain the related certification, it is very necessary that you are bound to spend some time on carefully preparing for the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam, including choosing the convenient and practical study materials, sticking to study and keep an optimistic attitude and so on.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Business Value and Competitive Differentiators: This section of the exam measures the skills of Technical Business Value Analysts and focuses on identifying the value proposition of Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs). Candidates will assess the technical business benefits of tools like Panorama and SCM. They will also recognize customer-relevant topics and align them with Palo Alto Networks' best solutions. Additionally, understanding Strata’s unique differentiators is a key component of this domain.
Topic 2	Deployment and Evaluation: This section of the exam measures the skills of Deployment Engineers and focuses on identifying the capabilities of Palo Alto Networks NGFWs. Candidates will evaluate features that protect against both known and unknown threats. They will also explain identity management from a deployment perspective and describe the proof of value (PoV) process, which includes assessing the effectiveness of NGFW solutions.
Topic 3	Architecture and Planning: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Architects and emphasizes understanding customer requirements and designing suitable deployment architectures. Candidates must explain Palo Alto Networks' platform networking capabilities in detail and evaluate their suitability for various environments. Handling aspects like system sizing and fine-tuning is also a critical skill assessed in this domain.
Topic 4	Network Security Strategy and Best Practices: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Strategy Specialists and highlights the importance of the Palo Alto Networks five-step Zero Trust methodology. Candidates must understand how to approach and apply the Zero Trust model effectively while emphasizing best practices to ensure robust network security.

>> Exam PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Success <<

Flexible PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Learning Mode | PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Certification Dump

The name of these formats are Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) PDF dumps file, desktop practice test software, and web-based practice test software. All these three Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) practice test formats are easy to use and perfectly work with all devices, operating systems, and web browsers. The PSE-Strata-Pro-24 PDF dumps file is a simple collection of Real and Updated PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Questions in PDF format and it is easy to install and use. Just install the Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) PDF dumps file on your desktop computer, laptop, tab, or even on your smartphone and start Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) exam preparation anytime and anywhere.

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Sample Questions (Q19-Q24):

NEW QUESTION # 19
While responding to a customer RFP, a systems engineer (SE) is presented the question, "How do PANW firewalls enable the mapping of transactions as part of Zero Trust principles?" Which two narratives can the SE use to respond to the question? (Choose two.)

A. Explain how the NGFW can be placed in the network so it has visibility into every traffic flow.
B. Emphasize Zero Trust as an ideology, and that the customer decides how to align to Zero Trust principles.
C. Describe how Palo Alto Networks NGFW Security policies are built by using users, applications, and data objects.
D. Reinforce the importance of decryption and security protections to verify traffic that is not malicious.

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
The question asks how Palo Alto Networks (PANW) Strata Hardware Firewalls enable the mapping of transactions as part of Zero Trust principles, requiring a systems engineer (SE) to provide two narratives for a customer RFP response. Zero Trust is a security model that assumes no trust by default, requiring continuous verification of all transactions, users, and devices-inside and outside the network. The Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW), part of the Strata portfolio, supports this through its advanced visibility, decryption, and policy enforcement capabilities. Below is a detailed explanation of why options B and D are the correct narratives, verified against official Palo Alto Networks documentation.
Step 1: Understanding Zero Trust and Transaction Mapping in PAN-OS
Zero Trust principles, as defined by frameworks like NIST SP 800-207, emphasize identifying and verifying every transaction (e.g., network flows, application requests) based on context such as user identity, application, and data. For Palo Alto Networks NGFWs, "mapping of transactions" refers to the ability to identify, classify, and control network traffic with granular detail, enabling verification and enforcement aligned with Zero Trust.
The PAN-OS operating system achieves this through:
* App-ID: Identifies applications regardless of port or protocol.
* User-ID: Maps IP addresses to user identities.
* Content-ID: Inspects and protects content, including decryption for visibility.
* Security Policies: Enforces rules based on these mappings.
Reference: Palo Alto Networks Zero Trust Architecture Guide
"Zero Trust requires visibility into all traffic, verification of trust, and enforcement of least privilege policies- capabilities delivered by PAN-OS through App-ID, User-ID, and Content-ID." Step 2: Evaluating the Narratives Let's analyze each option to determine which two best explain how PANW firewalls enable transaction mapping for Zero Trust:
Option A: Emphasize Zero Trust as an ideology, and that the customer decides how to align to Zero Trust principles.
Analysis: While Zero Trust is indeed a guiding philosophy, this narrative is vague and does not directly address how the firewall enables transaction mapping. It shifts responsibility to the customer without highlighting specific PAN-OS capabilities, making it less relevant to the question.
Conclusion: Not a suitable answer.
Reference: Palo Alto Networks Zero Trust Overview - "Zero Trust is a strategy, but Palo Alto Networks provides the tools to implement it." Option B: Reinforce the importance of decryption and security protections to verify traffic that is not malicious.
Analysis: Decryption is a cornerstone of Zero Trust because encrypted traffic (e.g., TLS/SSL) can hide malicious activity. PAN-OS NGFWs use SSL Forward Proxy and SSL Inbound Inspection to decrypt traffic, allowing full visibility into transactions. Once decrypted, App-ID and Content-ID classify the traffic and apply security protections (e.g., threat prevention, URL filtering) to verify it aligns with policy and is not malicious. This directly enables transaction mapping by ensuring all flows are identified and verified.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
Enable decryption under Policies > Decryption to inspect encrypted traffic.
App-ID identifies the application (e.g., HTTPS-based apps).
Content-ID scans for threats, ensuring the transaction is safe.
Logs (e.g., Traffic, Threat) map the transaction details (source, destination, app, user).
Conclusion: Correct answer-directly ties to transaction mapping via visibility and verification.
Reference: PAN-OS Administrator's Guide (11.1) - Decryption Overview
"Decryption enables visibility into encrypted traffic, a requirement for Zero Trust, allowing the firewall to apply security policies and log transaction details." Option C: Explain how the NGFW can be placed in the network so it has visibility into every traffic flow.
Analysis: Network placement (e.g., inline deployment) is important for visibility, but it's a deployment strategy, not a capability of the firewall itself. While visibility is a prerequisite for Zero Trust, this narrative does not explain how the firewall maps transactions (e.g., via App-ID or User-ID). It's too indirect to fully address the question.
Conclusion: Not the strongest answer.
Reference: PAN-OS Deployment Guide - "Inline placement ensures visibility, but mapping requires App-ID and User-ID." Option D: Describe how Palo Alto Networks NGFW Security policies are built by using users, applications, and data objects.
Analysis: This narrative highlights the core PAN-OS features-User-ID, App-ID, and Content-ID-that enable transaction mapping. Security policies in PAN-OS are defined using:
Users: Mapped via User-ID from directory services (e.g., AD).
Applications: Identified by App-ID, even within encrypted flows.
Data Objects: Controlled via Content-ID (e.g., file types, sensitive data).These policies log and enforce transactions, providing the granular context required for Zero Trust (e.g., "Allow user Alice to access Salesforce, but block file uploads").
Step-by-Step Explanation:
Configure User-ID (Device > User Identification) to map IPs to users.
Use App-ID in policies (Policies > Security) to identify apps.
Define data objects (e.g., Objects > Custom Objects > Data Patterns) for content control.
Logs (e.g., Monitor > Logs > Traffic) record transaction mappings.
Conclusion: Correct answer-directly explains transaction mapping via policy enforcement.
Reference: PAN-OS Administrator's Guide (11.1) - Security Policy
"Security policies leverage User-ID, App-ID, and Content-ID to map and control transactions, aligning with Zero Trust least privilege." Step 3: Why B and D Are the Best Choices B: Focuses on decryption and verification, ensuring all transactions (even encrypted ones) are mapped and validated, a critical Zero Trust requirement.
D: Highlights the policy framework that maps transactions to users, apps, and data, enabling granular control and logging-core to Zero Trust enforcement.Together, they cover visibility (B) and enforcement (D), fully addressing how PANW firewalls implement transaction mapping for Zero Trust.
Step 4: Sample RFP Response Narratives
B Narrative: "Palo Alto Networks NGFWs enable Zero Trust by decrypting traffic to provide full visibility into transactions. Using SSL decryption and integrated security protections like threat prevention, the firewall verifies that traffic is not malicious, mapping every flow to ensure compliance with Zero Trust principles." D Narrative: "Our NGFWs map transactions through security policies built on users, applications, and data objects. By leveraging User-ID, App-ID, and Content-ID, the firewall identifies who is accessing what application and what data is involved, enforcing least privilege and logging every transaction for Zero Trust alignment." Conclusion The two narratives that best explain how PANW Strata Hardware Firewalls enable transaction mapping for Zero Trust are B and D. These are grounded in PAN-OS capabilities-decryption for visibility and policy- based mapping-verified by Palo Alto Networks documentation up to March 08, 2025, including PAN-OS
11.1 and the Zero Trust Architecture Guide.

NEW QUESTION # 20
Which two statements clarify the functionality and purchase options for Palo Alto Networks AIOps for NGFW? (Choose two.)

A. It forwards log data to Advanced WildFire to anticipate, prevent, or identify issues, and it uses machine learning (ML) to refine and adapt to the process.
B. It uses telemetry data to forecast, preempt, or identify issues, and it uses machine learning (ML) to adjust and enhance the process.
C. It is offered in two license tiers: a free version and a premium version.
D. It is offered in two license tiers: a commercial edition and an enterprise edition.

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
Palo Alto Networks AIOps for NGFW is a cloud-delivered service that leverages telemetry data and machine learning (ML) to provide proactive operational insights, best practice recommendations, and issue prevention.
* Why "It is offered in two license tiers: a free version and a premium version" (Correct Answer B)?AIOps for NGFW is available in two tiers:
* Free Tier:Provides basic operational insights and best practices at no additional cost.
* Premium Tier:Offers advanced capabilities, such as AI-driven forecasts, proactive issue prevention, and enhanced ML-based recommendations.
* Why "It uses telemetry data to forecast, preempt, or identify issues, and it uses machine learning (ML) to adjust and enhance the process" (Correct Answer C)?AIOps uses telemetry data from NGFWs to analyze operational trends, forecast potential problems, and recommend solutions before issues arise. ML continuously refines these insights by learning from real-world data, enhancing accuracy and effectiveness over time.
* Why not "It is offered in two license tiers: a commercial edition and an enterprise edition" (Option A)?This is incorrect because the licensing model for AIOps is based on "free" and "premium" tiers, not "commercial" and "enterprise" editions.
* Why not "It forwards log data to Advanced WildFire to anticipate, prevent, or identify issues, and it uses machine learning (ML) to refine and adapt to the process" (Option D)?AIOps does not rely on Advanced WildFire for its operation. Instead, it uses telemetry data directly from the NGFWs to perform operational and security analysis.

NEW QUESTION # 21
A prospective customer is concerned about stopping data exfiltration, data infiltration, and command-and- control (C2) activities over port 53.
Which subscription(s) should the systems engineer recommend?

A. Threat Prevention
B. Advanced Threat Prevention and Advanced URL Filtering
C. App-ID and Data Loss Prevention
D. DNS Security

Answer: D

Explanation:
Option C: It can be addressed with BGP confederations
Description: BGP confederations divide a single AS into sub-ASes (each with a private Confederation Member AS number), reducing the iBGP full-mesh requirement while maintaining a unified external AS.
Analysis:
How It Works:
Single AS (e.g., AS 65000) is split into sub-ASes (e.g., 65001, 65002).
Within each sub-AS, iBGP full mesh or route reflectors are used.
Between sub-ASes, eBGP-like peering (confederation EBGP) connects them, but externally, it appears as one AS.
Segregation:
Each sub-AS can represent a unique BGP environment (e.g., department, site) with its own routing policies.
Firewalls within a sub-AS peer via iBGP; across sub-ASes, they use confederation EBGP.
PAN-OS Support:
Configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP > Confederation" with a Confederation Member AS number.
Ideal for large internal networks needing segmentation without multiple public AS numbers.
Benefits:
Simplifies internal BGP management.
Aligns with the customer's need for unique internal BGP environments.
Verification:
"BGP confederations reduce full-mesh burden by dividing an AS into sub-ASes" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com
/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
"Supports unique internal routing domains" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).
Conclusion: Directly addresses the requirement with a supported, practical solution. Applicable.
Option D: It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work Analysis:
iBGP Full Mesh: Traditional iBGP requires all routers in an AS to peer with each other, scaling poorly (n(n-
1)/2 connections).
Mitigation: PAN-OS supports alternatives:
Route Reflectors: Centralize iBGP peering.
Confederations: Divide the AS into sub-ASes (see Option C).
This statement ignores these features, falsely claiming BGP's limitation prevents segregation.
Verification:
"Confederations and route reflectors eliminate full-mesh needs" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan- os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS overcomes full-mesh constraints. Not Applicable.
Step 3: Recommendation Justification
Why Option C?
Alignment: Confederations allow the internal network to be segregated into unique BGP environments (sub- ASes) while maintaining a single external AS, perfectly matching the customer's need.
Scalability: Reduces iBGP full-mesh complexity, ideal for large or segmented internal networks.
PAN-OS Support: Explicitly implemented in BGP configuration, validated by documentation.
Why Not Others?
A: False-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation.
B: eBGP is for external ASes, not internal segregation; less practical than confederations.
D: Misrepresents BGP capabilities; full mesh isn't required with confederations or route reflectors.
Step 4: Verified References
BGP Confederations: "Divide an AS into sub-ASes for internal segmentation" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com
/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
PAN-OS BGP: "Supports eBGP, iBGP, and confederations for routing flexibility" (paloaltonetworks.com, PAN-OS Networking Guide).
Use Case: "Confederations suit large internal networks" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).

NEW QUESTION # 22
Which three use cases are specific to Policy Optimizer? (Choose three.)

A. Enabling migration from port-based rules to application-based rules
B. Automating the tagging of rules based on historical log data
C. Converting broad rules based on application filters into narrow rules based on application groups
D. Discovering 5-tuple attributes that can be simplified to 4-tuple attributes
E. Discovering applications on the network and transitions to application-based policy over time

Answer: A,C,E

Explanation:
* Discovering Applications on the Network (Answer A):
* Policy Optimizeranalyzes traffic logs to identifyapplications running on the networkthat are currently being allowed by port-based or overly permissive policies.
* It providesvisibilityinto these applications, enabling administrators to transition to more secure, application-based policies over time.
* Converting Broad Rules into Narrow Rules (Answer B):
* Policy Optimizer helps refine policies byconverting broad application filters(e.g., rules that allow all web applications) intonarrower rules based on specific application groups.
* This reduces the risk of overly permissive access while maintaining granular control.
* Migrating from Port-Based Rules to Application-Based Rules (Answer C):
* One of the primary use cases for Policy Optimizer is enabling organizations tomigrate from legacy port-based rules to application-based rules, which are more secure and aligned with Zero Trust principles.
* Policy Optimizer identifies traffic patterns and automatically recommends the necessary application-based policies.
* Why Not D:
* 5-tuple attributes (source IP, destination IP, source port, destination port, protocol)are used in traditional firewalls. Simplifying these attributes to 4-tuple (e.g., removing the protocol) is not a use case for Policy Optimizer, as Palo Alto Networks NGFWs focus onapplication-based policies, not just 5-tuple matching.
* Why Not E:
* Automating tagging of rules based on historical log data is not a specific feature of Policy Optimizer. While Policy Optimizer analyzes log data to recommend policy changes, tagging is not its primary use case.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* Policy Optimizer Overview
* Transitioning to Application-Based Policies

NEW QUESTION # 23
A systems engineer (SE) has joined a team to work with a managed security services provider (MSSP) that is evaluating PAN-OS for edge connections to their customer base. The MSSP is concerned about how to efficiently handle routing with all of its customers, especially how to handle BGP peering, because it has created a standard set of rules and settings that it wants to apply to each customer, as well as to maintain and update them. The solution requires logically separated BGP peering setups for each customer. What should the SE do to increase the probability of Palo Alto Networks being awarded the deal?

A. Confirm to the MSSP that the existing virtual routers will allow them to have logically separated BGP peering setups, but that there is no method to handle the standard criteria across all of the routers.
B. Collaborate with the MSSP to create an API call with a standard set of routing filters, maps, and related actions, then the MSSP can call the API whenever they bring on a new customer.
C. Establish with the MSSP the use of vsys as the better way to segregate their environment so that customer data does not intermingle.
D. Work with the MSSP to plan for the enabling of logical routers in the PAN-OS Advanced Routing Engine to allow sharing of routing profiles across the logical routers.

Answer: D

Explanation:
To address the MSSP's requirement for logically separated BGP peering setups while efficiently managing standard routing rules and updates, Palo Alto Networks offers theAdvanced Routing Engineintroduced in PAN-OS 11.0. The Advanced Routing Engine enhances routing capabilities, including support forlogical routers, which is critical in this scenario.
Why A is Correct
* Logical routers enable the MSSP to create isolated BGP peering configurations for each customer.
* The Advanced Routing Engine allows the MSSP to share standard routing profiles (such as filters, policies, or maps) across logical routers, simplifying the deployment and maintenance of routing configurations.
* This approach ensures scalability, as each logical router can handle the unique needs of a customer while leveraging shared routing rules.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
* B:While using APIs to automate deployment is beneficial, it does not solve the need for logically separated BGP peering setups. Logical routers provide this separation natively.
* C:While virtual routers in PAN-OS can separate BGP peering setups, they do not support the efficient sharing of standard routing rules and profiles across multiple routers.
* D:Virtual systems (vsys) are used to segregate administrative domains, not routing configurations. Vsys is not the appropriate solution for managing BGP peering setups across multiple customers.
Key Takeaways:
* PAN-OS Advanced Routing Engine with logical routers simplifies BGP peering management for MSSPs.
* Logical routers provide the separation required for customer environments while enabling shared configuration profiles.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 11.0 Advanced Routing Documentation

NEW QUESTION # 24
......

Many customers may be doubtful about our price. The truth is our price is relatively cheap among our peer. The inevitable trend is that knowledge is becoming worthy, and it explains why good PSE-Strata-Pro-24 resources, services and data worth a good price. We always put our customers in the first place. Helping candidates to pass the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam has always been a virtue in our company’s culture, and you can connect with us through email at the process of purchasing and using, we would reply you as fast as we can.

Flexible PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Learning Mode: https://www.validvce.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-exam-collection.html

BONUS!!! Download part of ValidVCE PSE-Strata-Pro-24 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1d9JAebXaAKfULzPr1WM0S7KyhXuuERWi

Mike Miller Mike Miller

Biography

Download Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Dumps after Paying Affordable Charges

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Flexible PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Learning Mode | PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Certification Dump

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Sample Questions (Q19-Q24):

Quick Links

Resources

Support